Article Text
Abstract
Introduction Human ocular trematode infections, caused by parasitic flatworms, are a significant public health concern worldwide. It can lead to mild-to-severe consequences if untreated. This protocol outlines a scoping review methodology, which aims to explore the knowledge on the aetiopathogenesis, clinico-epidemiological and diagnostic aspects, and patient perspectives related to ocular trematode infections in humans.
Methods and analysis The review, including the development of the review protocol, will be conducted over 2 years from January 2024. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual and the framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley will be used as the guidelines for the scoping review that is suggested in this protocol. Accordingly, the PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framework and three-stage search strategy will be used to develop the research question and to conduct the search respectively. Publications up to December 2024 will be searched across multiple databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, CINAHL and Google Scholar.
Ethics and dissemination Since the study will make use of secondary data, ethical approval will not be required. The scoping review’s findings will be published in a scientific journal and presented at relevant conferences, aiming to improve the disease outcomes through guiding future research in ocular trematode infections and informing potential strategies to uplift the disease control and prevention measures and patient care.
- Corneal and external diseases
- Diagnostic microbiology
- Epidemiology
- Molecular diagnostics
- Public health
- Tropical medicine
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
- Corneal and external diseases
- Diagnostic microbiology
- Epidemiology
- Molecular diagnostics
- Public health
- Tropical medicine
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY
The standard protocol followed in this scoping review will ensure the transparency and clarity of the synthesised evidence on ocular trematode infections in humans.
Searching evidence in multiple electronic databases using an effective search strategy will guarantee thorough coverage of the available evidence in the literature.
The quality assessment of the included studies will enhance the validity and reliability of the evidence discussed in this review.
Only studies that are published in English will be included in this review.
Introduction
Eye infections include a broad spectrum of diseases caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites, resulting from mild conjunctivitis to severe conditions that can lead to impaired vision or blindness.1 Among parasitic eye infections, trematode eye infections represent a distinct and relatively rare subset. Trematodes, or flukes, are a diverse group of parasitic flatworms, and their infection in the eye can lead to a spectrum of pathological consequences, ranging from mild irritation to severe vision impairment or even blindness if left untreated. These parasites can infiltrate various ocular tissues, causing inflammation, tissue damage and structural alterations that compromise the visual function of the affected individual.2–4
Trematodes have complex life cycles involving intermediate hosts, snails and freshwater fish or crustaceans. For example, ocular trematodes, those of the genus Philophthalmus, are known to have complex life cycles requiring multiple hosts at different stages.5 Accordingly, snails serve as the first intermediate hosts, releasing cercariae into the water. The definitive host, typically an aquatic bird, acquires the infection through direct eye contact with cercariae or metacercariae in the water or by consuming metacercariae,6 and the definitive host can have corneal lesions with oedema and ulcers, conjunctival hyperaemia, keratitis, eye discharges and corneal abscess. Additionally, systemic signs such as dehydration and emaciation can also be seen.7 8
Trematode cercariae can penetrate the skin or mucous membranes of mammals.9 Though uncommon, humans can become an accidental host, and the role of humans as accidental hosts is highlighted in several studies from across the tropics.3 10–13 The exact path of pathogen entry into the human ocular tissue still remains unknown. Cercariae or metacercariae can enter the eye directly while bathing or swimming in freshwater14–16 or by consumption of raw or undercooked freshwater fish or crustaceans that serve as intermediate hosts for certain trematode species.12 14 Ocular trematode infections were identified among those who have engaged in freshwater-related activities. For example, several South Indian studies highlighted the possible role of trematodes in ocular granulomas in children who used to bathe in lakes or rivers.3 10 11 A year-long study conducted in Tamil Nadu, India, has found allergic conjunctival granulomas in 34 children from a single village who used the same freshwater pond for bathing. The clinical presentation was thus linked to potential trematode infections acquired through freshwater.10 Another similar study revealed evidence of trematode infection in patients who presented with clinical features of allergic conjunctival granuloma and with a history of water-related activities, especially swimming in freshwater reservoirs.11
Molecular studies conducted to identify the trematode species causing ocular infection in children and their potential vectors further indicate the high possibility of getting the infection through freshwater sources. One such study analysed the DNA isolated from surgically removed granulomas of children and from the trematode cercariae released by the snail Melanoides tuberculata found in the freshwater reservoir of those children used to bathe. Real-time and conventional PCR analysis followed by bidirectional sequencing and BLAST analysis identified maximum sequence similarity between the granuloma samples and the trematode cercariae Procerovum varium aiding the identification of the possible trematode species and vectors for ocular trematode infection in human.3 Moreover, digenic trematode DNA was detected in 6 out of 14 excised nodules of waterborne ophthalmic granulomas of the anterior chamber in a series of Egyptian patients.17 Ingestion of infected intermediate hosts of certain trematode species (eg, Procerovum spp) can introduce the infective larvae into the human digestive tract. These larvae can then penetrate the intestinal wall, enter the bloodstream and migrate to various organs, including the eyes, where they can cause localised pathology.12 However, the available information is not adequate to exclude oral inoculation in humans as not a part of the normal life cycle of those trematodes.
The clinical symptoms and signs vary, depending on the type of the infected parasite, the stage of the infection and the ocular tissues involved. Further, the host immune responses which include local defence mechanisms play a pivotal role in determining the severity of the infection.18 19 However, several typical features may aid in clinical suspicion and diagnosis such as eye redness, pain or discomfort, excessive tearing or watery eyes, itching or irritation, eye discharge, swollen eyelids, change in the appearance of the eye, photophobia, foreign body sensation and blurred or decreased vision.3 11 Granuloma formation or systemic symptoms due to the infection are some occasional clinical consequences.3 20 In the absence of timely intervention, the disease can cause serious consequences including blindness.2 Thus, delayed diagnosis can affect the quality of life of the patient and the overall disease burden. Further understanding the patient’s perspectives of the disease is pivotal to knowing its impacts and the prevention and control of these infections.
The insidious nature of these infections underscores the importance of timely detection and intervention to mitigate the risk of irreversible ocular damage. A recent study identified different trematode species causing ocular infections in Sri Lankan children denoting the need for a collective approach among clinicians and parasitologists, for improved community awareness for effective diagnosis, control and prevention of the disease.16 Thus, understanding the epidemiology, clinical presentation, risk factors and patient’s perception of ocular trematode infections is crucial in identifying effective disease control and prevention strategies. Summarising the current body of evidence not only provides insights into the aetiopathogenesis, clinico-epidemiological and diagnostic aspects, and patient perspectives related to ocular trematode infections in humans but also helps identify the areas that require further investigation. Moreover, a comprehensive synthesis of the literature enables researchers and healthcare practitioners to gain scientific information to design targeted studies and develop evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis, management and prevention of this challenging condition.
Methodology
The proposed protocol is for a scoping review of the literature on human ocular trematode infections. The proposed scoping review will be guided by the methodological framework provided by Arksey and O’Malley and the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual (JBI)21 and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).22 The review method will follow the suggested structure and consist of five stages: (1) identification of the research question, (2) identification of relevant studies, (3) selection of studies, (4) charting the data and (5) collating and summarising the results.
The review will be conducted over a planned period from January 2024 to December 2025. This timeline includes the initial development of the protocol, database searches, study selection, data extraction, synthesis of results and manuscript preparation. Database search will be initiated on acceptance of the review protocol.
Stage 1: identifying the review question
The research question has been developed using the PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framework, as per the JBI manual for evidence Synthesis.21 The PCC framework followed in the review is given in table 1.
PCC framework used in developing the review question
The main research question is ‘What are the aetiopathogenic, clinico-epidemiological and diagnostic aspects, and patient perspectives related to ocular trematode infections in humans?’
The study’s objectives were developed in response to addressing specific research questions. The specific research questions of the scoping review are the following:
What are the global and regional prevalences of ocular trematode infections in humans?
What are the epidemiological characteristics of ocular trematode infections in humans?
What are the aetiological agents of ocular trematode infections in humans and their natural animal hosts?
What are the risk factors for ocular trematode infections in humans?
What are the clinical presentations of ocular trematode infections in humans?
What is the immune response to ocular trematode infections in humans?
What are the histopathological and molecular diagnostic methods of ocular trematode infections in humans?
What are the different treatments used for ocular trematode infections and their outcomes?
What are the patient perspectives on ocular trematode infections?
Stage 2: identification of relevant studies
The JBI three-stage search strategy will be used in this review.21 The first step will be a limited search of PUBMED using common keywords such as ((((“ocular”[All Fields]) OR (“eye”[All Fields])) OR (“ophthalmic”[All Fields])) OR (ophthalm*)) AND ((((((“trematode”[All Fields]) OR (“fluke”[All Fields])) OR (“flat worms”[All Fields])) OR (trematod*)) OR (“flukes”[All Fields])) OR (“flat worm”[All Fields])), after which the text terms found in the article’s title, abstract and index terms will be analysed. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, CINAHL and Google Scholar. The search will be conducted across these databases up to December 2024. Third, a search for additional studies will be conducted through the reference list of all identified papers and articles.
Stage 3: selection of eligible studies
The PCC framework and the following inclusion and exclusion criteria will be used to guide the selection of eligible studies. All the studies that meet the inclusion criteria and are published up to December 2024 will be considered in this review. A table will be created with the outcomes of both manual and electronic database searches. The selected articles from each database will be uploaded into Mendeley reference management software. After deduplicating, two reviewers will independently review each title and abstract, considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The articles that do not meet the inclusion criteria will be removed. Any difference of opinion will be discussed between the two reviewers to reach a consensus.
Inclusion criteria
All original research articles, case series and case reports reporting experimental or observational studies with quantitative or qualitative data on clinico-epidemiological aspects, aetiopathogenesis, immunological response, risk factors, molecular and histopathological characteristics, diagnosis, treatment and patient perspectives related to ocular trematode infections in human.
Exclusion criteria
Studies that are not available in the full-text article, review articles and studies not published in the English language and non-human studies will be excluded.
Quality assessment of the included studies
Critical appraisal tools developed by the JBI21 will be used to assess the quality of the included studies. Quality assessment will be used to assess the validity, reliability and any biases of the reported evidence to enhance the transparency of this review.
Stage 4: charting the data
Articles that are selected through the above step will be used to chart the data. Information will be extracted to a table that was developed using the template data extraction instrument for scoping reviews in the JBI guidance for conducting a scoping review.21 To reduce bias and inaccuracies, this process will be carried out independently by two reviewers in duplicate. Disagreements among the reviewers will be resolved by discussion.
The data extraction form will include the following details:
Title
Author
Publication year
The country where the research was conducted
Study setting/population
Study design
Sample size
Aims and objectives
Criteria of participant selection
Key findings
Prevalence
Epidemiological characteristics
Aetiological agents and their natural hosts
Clinical characteristics
Risk factors
Histopathological characteristics
Molecular characteristics
Immune responses
Diagnosis
Treatment and outcome
Patient perspectives
Conclusion/s
Stage 5: collating, summarising and reporting the results
The extracted data will be analysed and presented focusing on the aim of the review as well as the specific research questions. This will be reviewed by two independent researchers to ensure consistency and reliability. In alignment with the objective of this study, a descriptive summary will be created to provide an overview of the study characteristics and key findings. Following the PRISMA-ScR criteria, the scoping review results will be presented narratively, establishing a thorough and well-organised summary of the literature on aetiopathogenic, clinico-epidemiological and diagnostic aspects, and patient perspectives related to human ocular trematode infections. Visual tools such as summary tables, graphs and conceptual frameworks will be used to present the key results. The findings are expected to be presented in a full scoping review article.
Patient and public involvement
None.
Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval is not required as the scoping review technique intends to synthesise information from publicly available articles. A report summarising the scoping review’s findings will be published as a full scoping review article in a scientific journal and will be presented at relevant conferences as part of dissemination strategies. We expect the scoping review’s findings to contribute to the advancement of understanding of ocular trematode infections, ultimately improving patient outcomes and guiding future research endeavours in this field. Also, the review’s findings could have significant policy implications and inform public health strategies related to the prevention and management of ocular trematode infections.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Footnotes
Contributors PK contributed in the development of search strategy and drafting of the protocol. HW contributed in the development of search strategy and drafting and editing of the protocol. AS and SW were involved in editing the manuscript. KW contributed in the conceptualisation, development of search strategy and extensive editing of the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript. KW is the guarantor.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.