You are here

Article info

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Urology
Protocol
Robotic versus open urological oncological surgery: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

  • Giovanni E Cacciamani USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Karanvir Gill USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Inderbir S Gill USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr Giovanni E Cacciamani; giovanni.cacciamani{at}gmail.com
View Full Text

Citation

Cacciamani GE, Gill K, Gill IS
Robotic versus open urological oncological surgery: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ Open 2020;10:e036609. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036609

Publication history

  • Received December 23, 2019
  • Revised December 31, 2019
  • Accepted January 8, 2020
  • First published February 10, 2020.
Online issue publication 
February 14, 2023
Previous versions
Review history

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.