Table 2

Diversity of reported outcomes and critical appraisal results of the included studies

StudyAccuracy and reliability outcomesImplementation outcomesJBI critical appraisal checklists22
Sensitivity and specificityDA/
AUC		PPV and NPVCorrectly
diagnosed
lesions		NNEBiopsy rateInter
observer
agreement		Inter
instrument
reliability		OR/
relative
risk		Survey/
PCP opinion		Cost-effective analysisResponse time for TDSPatient satisfactionImage
quality
for TDS		Diagnostic
test
accuracy
studies		RCTsAnalytical
cross-
sectional
studies		Quasi-
experimental studies		Case seriesCohort studies
RCTs and sequential intervention trials
Argenziano et al 23  
Koelink et al 24  
Menzies et al 14  
Rosendahl et al 43  
Ferrándiz et al 26  
Non-RCT diagnostic accuracy studies 
Ahmadi et al 27  
Bourne et al 28  
Menzies et al 29  
Pagnanelli et al 30  
Rogers et al 31  
Rogers et al 32  
Rosendahl et al 25  
Secker et al 44  
Westerhoff et al 33  
Börve et al 34  
Grimaldi et al 35  
Livingstone and Solomon41  
Moreno-Ramirez et al 36  
van der Heijden et al 37  
Survey-based studies 
Chappuis et al 38  
Morris et al 39  
Morris et al 40  
Stratton and Loescher42  

  • Graphicdenotes that these accuracy and reliability outcomes were reported in this study; Graphicdenotes that these implementation outcomes were reported in this study

  • Key to JBI score: Graphic; >60%: Graphic; <30%: Graphic.

  • AUC, area under the curve; DA, diagnostic accuracy; JBI, Joanna Briggs Institute; NNE, number needed to excise; NPV, negative predictive value;OR, Odds Ratio; PCP, primary care physician; PPV, positive predictive value; RCTs, randomised controlled trials; TDS, teledermoscopy.